https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10950 Where a bona fide dispute exists as to title or entitlement to receive consideration for property acquired under Chapter XX-C, the statutory mechanism permits deposit of the amount with the appropriate authority under section 269UG(3) instead of tendering it directly under section 269UG(1). The court's analysis treats a genuine doubt about ownership or entitlement as sufficient to attract section 269UG(3), including cases where documentary proof of joint ownership is absent. On the facts noted, the authority's finding of a title dispute meant its action was not without jurisdiction or illegal, and the writ challenge failed on merits. en-us Fri, 29 Aug 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 28 Jul 2009 11:14:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10950 Where a bona fide dispute exists as to title or entitlement to receive consideration for property acquired under Chapter XX-C, the statutory mechanism permits deposit of the amount with the appropriate authority under section 269UG(3) instead of tendering it directly under section 269UG(1). The court's analysis treats a genuine doubt about ownership or entitlement as sufficient to attract section 269UG(3), including cases where documentary proof of joint ownership is absent. On the facts noted, the authority's finding of a title dispute meant its action was not without jurisdiction or illegal, and the writ challenge failed on merits. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 29 Aug 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10950