<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 676 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352407</link>
    <description>The court allowed the petition challenging an order granting exemption from cost recovery charges, directing that the exemption should be effective from the date of the application (12.04.2013) rather than the order date. The court emphasized meeting conditions for exemption, including performance norms and outstanding charges, and held that non-payment of charges post-application should not affect exemption eligibility. The court clarified that prospective exemption should apply from the application date if conditions are met, ordering a refund of charges paid by the petitioners and stressing the need for timely communication and processing of applications.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2018 18:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=499688" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 676 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352407</link>
      <description>The court allowed the petition challenging an order granting exemption from cost recovery charges, directing that the exemption should be effective from the date of the application (12.04.2013) rather than the order date. The court emphasized meeting conditions for exemption, including performance norms and outstanding charges, and held that non-payment of charges post-application should not affect exemption eligibility. The court clarified that prospective exemption should apply from the application date if conditions are met, ordering a refund of charges paid by the petitioners and stressing the need for timely communication and processing of applications.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352407</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>