<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 671 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352402</link>
    <description>The Madras HC construed the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 and the Pondicherry Rules to require assessment soon after the close of the relevant year, holding that the statutory language did not allow an initial assessment to be deferred indefinitely. It further held that the five-year reassessment power could not be used to justify completing the first assessment nearly a decade later. On Form C declarations, the Court accepted that concessional tax treatment depends on proper statutory production, but ruled that the revenue could not keep the matter pending without limit and then apply the higher rate after such delay. The assessment orders were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2017 09:57:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=499683" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 671 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352402</link>
      <description>The Madras HC construed the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 and the Pondicherry Rules to require assessment soon after the close of the relevant year, holding that the statutory language did not allow an initial assessment to be deferred indefinitely. It further held that the five-year reassessment power could not be used to justify completing the first assessment nearly a decade later. On Form C declarations, the Court accepted that concessional tax treatment depends on proper statutory production, but ruled that the revenue could not keep the matter pending without limit and then apply the higher rate after such delay. The assessment orders were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352402</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>