<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 665 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352396</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found serious irregularities and misconduct by a company, leading to non-cooperation of respondents in legal proceedings. Interim directions were issued under Section 242(4) of the Companies Act, 2013, suspending current directors and appointing nominee directors. The judgment emphasized compliance with Supreme Court orders related to bail proceedings, ensuring refunds to home buyers and outlining specific timelines. The Tribunal addressed public interest concerns, establishing a prima facie case based on investigations and opinions, despite the respondents&#039; lack of cooperation in the legal process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2017 09:56:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=499677" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 665 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352396</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found serious irregularities and misconduct by a company, leading to non-cooperation of respondents in legal proceedings. Interim directions were issued under Section 242(4) of the Companies Act, 2013, suspending current directors and appointing nominee directors. The judgment emphasized compliance with Supreme Court orders related to bail proceedings, ensuring refunds to home buyers and outlining specific timelines. The Tribunal addressed public interest concerns, establishing a prima facie case based on investigations and opinions, despite the respondents&#039; lack of cooperation in the legal process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352396</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>