<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 646 - ITAT AGRA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352377</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that imposing multiple penalties for a single default under Section 271(1)(b) of the Income Tax Act was not permissible. It found that the notice issued for multiple assessment years lacked validity as it demanded irrelevant information and did not provide a reasonable opportunity of being heard. Consequently, all penalties based on this notice were cancelled, and the appeals were allowed in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 12:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=499658" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 646 - ITAT AGRA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352377</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that imposing multiple penalties for a single default under Section 271(1)(b) of the Income Tax Act was not permissible. It found that the notice issued for multiple assessment years lacked validity as it demanded irrelevant information and did not provide a reasonable opportunity of being heard. Consequently, all penalties based on this notice were cancelled, and the appeals were allowed in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352377</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>