<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1962 (10) TMI 75 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196763</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court dismissed Appeal No. 378/1962 by the appellants, upholding the invalidity of Rule 4(A) of the Central Civil Services (Conduct) Rules, 1955, regarding participation in demonstrations. Appeal No. 379/1962 by the respondent was allowed, leading to the quashing of departmental proceedings against him for contraventions of both Rules 4(A) and 4(B). The Court found Rule 4-B invalid as it restricted the fundamental right to form associations, emphasizing that the association&#039;s recognition did not directly impact public order. Consequently, the respondent was absolved of the charges based on the invalidated rules.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 17:52:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=499645" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1962 (10) TMI 75 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196763</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court dismissed Appeal No. 378/1962 by the appellants, upholding the invalidity of Rule 4(A) of the Central Civil Services (Conduct) Rules, 1955, regarding participation in demonstrations. Appeal No. 379/1962 by the respondent was allowed, leading to the quashing of departmental proceedings against him for contraventions of both Rules 4(A) and 4(B). The Court found Rule 4-B invalid as it restricted the fundamental right to form associations, emphasizing that the association&#039;s recognition did not directly impact public order. Consequently, the respondent was absolved of the charges based on the invalidated rules.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196763</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>