https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196763 A total prohibition on demonstrations by government servants was held to infringe Articles 19(1)(a) and 19(1)(b), while the ban on strikes was upheld because there is no fundamental right to strike. Rule 4(B), requiring cessation of membership of an unrecognized or derecognized service association, was found invalid under Article 19(1)(c) since the restriction lacked a real, proximate and direct relation to public order and was excessive. Departmental proceedings based solely on participation in demonstrations and preparation for a strike under the invalid part of Rule 4(A) could not survive and were quashed. en-us Tue, 30 Oct 1962 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 13 Dec 2017 17:52:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196763 A total prohibition on demonstrations by government servants was held to infringe Articles 19(1)(a) and 19(1)(b), while the ban on strikes was upheld because there is no fundamental right to strike. Rule 4(B), requiring cessation of membership of an unrecognized or derecognized service association, was found invalid under Article 19(1)(c) since the restriction lacked a real, proximate and direct relation to public order and was excessive. Departmental proceedings based solely on participation in demonstrations and preparation for a strike under the invalid part of Rule 4(A) could not survive and were quashed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 30 Oct 1962 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196763