<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 1293 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196758</link>
    <description>The article concerns a bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. in an NDPS case involving alleged recovery of cough syrup and Diazepam tablets from the accused and a co-accused. It notes that the co-accused was not shown to be involved in other cases, while the petitioner was stated to be involved in three other cases, including one under the NDPS Act. During hearing, counsel for the petitioner sought to withdraw the petition, and it was dismissed as withdrawn.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 17:30:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=499639" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 1293 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196758</link>
      <description>The article concerns a bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. in an NDPS case involving alleged recovery of cough syrup and Diazepam tablets from the accused and a co-accused. It notes that the co-accused was not shown to be involved in other cases, while the petitioner was stated to be involved in three other cases, including one under the NDPS Act. During hearing, counsel for the petitioner sought to withdraw the petition, and it was dismissed as withdrawn.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196758</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>