<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (7) TMI 1142 - SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196754</link>
    <description>A stock broker was found not to have violated the code of conduct for failure to exercise due skill, care and diligence because it had complied with KYC requirements, acted only on client instructions, and did not trade on its own account in the scrip. The record showed market activity and corporate announcements during the relevant period, while the connected clients also traded in other scrips through the broker. In the absence of substantial evidence of prior understanding, collusion, or any link beyond the ordinary broker-client relationship, mere execution of trades for connected clients was insufficient to establish misconduct. No monetary penalty was warranted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 16:59:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=499635" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (7) TMI 1142 - SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196754</link>
      <description>A stock broker was found not to have violated the code of conduct for failure to exercise due skill, care and diligence because it had complied with KYC requirements, acted only on client instructions, and did not trade on its own account in the scrip. The record showed market activity and corporate announcements during the relevant period, while the connected clients also traded in other scrips through the broker. In the absence of substantial evidence of prior understanding, collusion, or any link beyond the ordinary broker-client relationship, mere execution of trades for connected clients was insufficient to establish misconduct. No monetary penalty was warranted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196754</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>