https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196751 The appeal was dismissed, and the appellant was ordered to pay costs. The Court found that the respondents had reasonable and probable cause for their legal actions based on expert advice. Claims related to customs actions and slander of goods were not upheld, and a specific head of damage was excluded from the damages enquiry due to the voluntary nature of the appellant's actions. en-us Thu, 13 Jun 1929 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 13 Dec 2017 15:35:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196751 The appeal was dismissed, and the appellant was ordered to pay costs. The Court found that the respondents had reasonable and probable cause for their legal actions based on expert advice. Claims related to customs actions and slander of goods were not upheld, and a specific head of damage was excluded from the damages enquiry due to the voluntary nature of the appellant's actions. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 13 Jun 1929 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196751