https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196750 The court ruled in favor of the Plaintiff in a defamation case against the Defendant for publishing a defamatory advertisement. The Defendant's advertisement was found to be disparaging towards the Plaintiff's institute, leading to a decree of injunction against the Defendant from using any defamatory words in their advertisements. However, the Plaintiff's claim for recovery of damages was rejected due to insufficient proof of quantified damages. The court granted the injunction, restrained the Defendant from using disparaging words, and awarded costs to the Plaintiff, disposing of the suit. en-us Tue, 22 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 13 Dec 2017 15:26:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196750 The court ruled in favor of the Plaintiff in a defamation case against the Defendant for publishing a defamatory advertisement. The Defendant's advertisement was found to be disparaging towards the Plaintiff's institute, leading to a decree of injunction against the Defendant from using any defamatory words in their advertisements. However, the Plaintiff's claim for recovery of damages was rejected due to insufficient proof of quantified damages. The court granted the injunction, restrained the Defendant from using disparaging words, and awarded costs to the Plaintiff, disposing of the suit. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 22 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196750