https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196746 The court dismissed the appeal, upholding the decision that the commercial telecast by the Respondents did not disparage the Appellant's product. Consequently, the Appellant was not entitled to an injunction against the telecast. The court emphasized the protection of commercial speech under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution, highlighting that while boasting about one's product is permissible, disparaging a rival product is not. The court found no merit in the Appellant's claims and affirmed the rejection of the injunction application. en-us Tue, 02 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 13 Dec 2017 14:55:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196746 The court dismissed the appeal, upholding the decision that the commercial telecast by the Respondents did not disparage the Appellant's product. Consequently, the Appellant was not entitled to an injunction against the telecast. The court emphasized the protection of commercial speech under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution, highlighting that while boasting about one's product is permissible, disparaging a rival product is not. The court found no merit in the Appellant's claims and affirmed the rejection of the injunction application. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 02 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196746