https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196744 The HC granted a temporary injunction under Order XXXIX Rules 1 & 2 CPC, restraining the defendant from broadcasting the impugned TV commercial, which was found to disparage the plaintiff's product, Dabur Chayawanprash. The court rejected the defendant's argument that 'Chayawanprash' is a generic term, concluding that the advertisement indirectly harmed the plaintiff's market share by suggesting its unsuitability for summer consumption. The plaintiff's application for injunction was allowed, protecting its business interests during the pendency of the lawsuit. en-us Fri, 28 May 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 15 Jun 2024 15:20:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196744 The HC granted a temporary injunction under Order XXXIX Rules 1 & 2 CPC, restraining the defendant from broadcasting the impugned TV commercial, which was found to disparage the plaintiff's product, Dabur Chayawanprash. The court rejected the defendant's argument that 'Chayawanprash' is a generic term, concluding that the advertisement indirectly harmed the plaintiff's market share by suggesting its unsuitability for summer consumption. The plaintiff's application for injunction was allowed, protecting its business interests during the pendency of the lawsuit. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 28 May 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196744