<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (5) TMI 872 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196740</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ petition, ruling that the subsequent Notification dated 21-10-1982 was valid and issued in the public interest. The court emphasized that government actions are presumed to be in the public interest unless proven otherwise. The petitioners&#039; arguments were deemed misconceived, and the petition was rejected with costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 14:07:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=499605" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (5) TMI 872 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196740</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ petition, ruling that the subsequent Notification dated 21-10-1982 was valid and issued in the public interest. The court emphasized that government actions are presumed to be in the public interest unless proven otherwise. The petitioners&#039; arguments were deemed misconceived, and the petition was rejected with costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196740</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>