https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196738 The court restrained the defendant from using the words "ONLY" and "FIRST" in their advertisements, determining these claims as misleading and constituting unfair trade practices under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. The decision was driven by the principles of public interest and consumer protection, underscoring the necessity for truthful and non-misleading advertising. The court's findings were stated to be prima facie, ensuring no prejudice to the final hearing of the suit. en-us Thu, 04 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 29 Nov 2024 18:24:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196738 The court restrained the defendant from using the words "ONLY" and "FIRST" in their advertisements, determining these claims as misleading and constituting unfair trade practices under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. The decision was driven by the principles of public interest and consumer protection, underscoring the necessity for truthful and non-misleading advertising. The court's findings were stated to be prima facie, ensuring no prejudice to the final hearing of the suit. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 04 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196738