https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196734 A candidate whose name remained in the published list of contesting candidates was treated as a contesting candidate for section 82 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, even after retirement under section 55A(2); where the petitioner also sought a declaration that another candidate was duly elected, non-joinder of such a candidate was mandatory and attracted dismissal under section 90(3). The security-deposit requirement under section 117 was treated as one of effective compliance: omission to state that the treasury deposit was made in favour of the Secretary to the Election Commission was not fatal if the deposit was otherwise valid and under the Commission's control, though the objection had to be decided on the evidence before the Tribunal. en-us Tue, 22 Apr 1958 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 13 Dec 2017 11:21:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196734 A candidate whose name remained in the published list of contesting candidates was treated as a contesting candidate for section 82 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, even after retirement under section 55A(2); where the petitioner also sought a declaration that another candidate was duly elected, non-joinder of such a candidate was mandatory and attracted dismissal under section 90(3). The security-deposit requirement under section 117 was treated as one of effective compliance: omission to state that the treasury deposit was made in favour of the Secretary to the Election Commission was not fatal if the deposit was otherwise valid and under the Commission's control, though the objection had to be decided on the evidence before the Tribunal. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 22 Apr 1958 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196734