<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (8) TMI 650 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196732</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal concerning the withdrawal of the suit, directing a fresh hearing. It upheld the decisions declaring the removal of Bhagirath Agarwal and his wife from the Board of Directors and the allotment of shares as illegal. The appeal against the removal and share allotment was dismissed, with no further orders under Section 340 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2018 16:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=499582" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (8) TMI 650 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196732</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal concerning the withdrawal of the suit, directing a fresh hearing. It upheld the decisions declaring the removal of Bhagirath Agarwal and his wife from the Board of Directors and the allotment of shares as illegal. The appeal against the removal and share allotment was dismissed, with no further orders under Section 340 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196732</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>