https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196731 The SC held that a belated objection on court fee and jurisdiction could not be treated as a preliminary issue after pleadings, evidence and final arguments had already concluded, because it was not a pure jurisdictional or statutory bar. The trial court and High Court were therefore justified in refusing to isolate that issue and in proceeding to judgment on all matters. The Court also upheld intervention-resistant orders and sustained realistic costs, stressing that repeated applications, delay tactics and obstructive litigation warrant deterrent costs to prevent abuse of process and ensure that frivolous conduct yields no advantage. en-us Mon, 04 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 02 Aug 2023 09:48:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196731 The SC held that a belated objection on court fee and jurisdiction could not be treated as a preliminary issue after pleadings, evidence and final arguments had already concluded, because it was not a pure jurisdictional or statutory bar. The trial court and High Court were therefore justified in refusing to isolate that issue and in proceeding to judgment on all matters. The Court also upheld intervention-resistant orders and sustained realistic costs, stressing that repeated applications, delay tactics and obstructive litigation warrant deterrent costs to prevent abuse of process and ensure that frivolous conduct yields no advantage. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 04 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196731