https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196730 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, directing the appellant to deposit the outstanding amount within a specified time to rectify the court's mistake in providing incorrect information regarding the deposit amount in a pre-emption decree. The Court emphasized the appellant's reliance on the court's directions and held that any negligence on his part was overshadowed by the court's error. The decision highlighted the court's duty to rectify its mistakes and prevent harm to litigants, ordering the appellant to comply with the corrected amount without extending the time for deposit. en-us Wed, 20 Feb 1963 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 13 Dec 2017 11:03:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196730 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, directing the appellant to deposit the outstanding amount within a specified time to rectify the court's mistake in providing incorrect information regarding the deposit amount in a pre-emption decree. The Court emphasized the appellant's reliance on the court's directions and held that any negligence on his part was overshadowed by the court's error. The decision highlighted the court's duty to rectify its mistakes and prevent harm to litigants, ordering the appellant to comply with the corrected amount without extending the time for deposit. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 20 Feb 1963 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196730