<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (9) TMI 12 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10937</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld various additions in block assessment proceedings under section 158BD of the Income-tax Act, including unexplained capital, household expenses, and gifts, based on evidence found during a search and seizure operation. The appellant challenged these additions, arguing that relying solely on statements recorded during the search without considering all available material on record was unjustified. The judgment also discussed issues related to the treatment of &#039;alternative&#039; grounds raised by the appellant and the comparison between gifts from different sources. Concerns were raised about the heavy reliance on statements recorded during the search and the perversity of the Tribunal&#039;s findings in sustaining additions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 08:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=49956" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (9) TMI 12 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10937</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld various additions in block assessment proceedings under section 158BD of the Income-tax Act, including unexplained capital, household expenses, and gifts, based on evidence found during a search and seizure operation. The appellant challenged these additions, arguing that relying solely on statements recorded during the search without considering all available material on record was unjustified. The judgment also discussed issues related to the treatment of &#039;alternative&#039; grounds raised by the appellant and the comparison between gifts from different sources. Concerns were raised about the heavy reliance on statements recorded during the search and the perversity of the Tribunal&#039;s findings in sustaining additions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10937</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>