https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352360 A statutory appeal under Section 27(1) of the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act does not extend to an interlocutory or procedural stay order of the Tribunal, because such an order is only prima facie and does not finally determine rights or liabilities. The interim stay arrangement was also treated as a discretionary and equitable exercise, and interference was unwarranted absent perversity or arbitrariness in the Tribunal's assessment. The payment condition was modified only to the limited extent of changing the instalment schedule from fortnightly to monthly, while the substantive stay terms remained intact. en-us Tue, 28 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 13 Dec 2017 08:27:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352360 A statutory appeal under Section 27(1) of the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act does not extend to an interlocutory or procedural stay order of the Tribunal, because such an order is only prima facie and does not finally determine rights or liabilities. The interim stay arrangement was also treated as a discretionary and equitable exercise, and interference was unwarranted absent perversity or arbitrariness in the Tribunal's assessment. The payment condition was modified only to the limited extent of changing the instalment schedule from fortnightly to monthly, while the substantive stay terms remained intact. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Tue, 28 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352360