https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352337 The Tribunal held that the department failed to prove clandestine clearance of cone yarn as hank yarn. The evidence contradicted the allegations, with stock registers and reeling machine operations supporting the appellants' case. Third-party documents and unexamined statements were deemed insufficient. Consequently, the duty demand and penalties were dismissed, and the appeals were allowed in favor of the appellants. The impugned order was set aside, and the judgment was pronounced on 27.11.2017. en-us Mon, 27 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 02 Feb 2018 18:06:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352337 The Tribunal held that the department failed to prove clandestine clearance of cone yarn as hank yarn. The evidence contradicted the allegations, with stock registers and reeling machine operations supporting the appellants' case. Third-party documents and unexamined statements were deemed insufficient. Consequently, the duty demand and penalties were dismissed, and the appeals were allowed in favor of the appellants. The impugned order was set aside, and the judgment was pronounced on 27.11.2017. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 27 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352337