https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352332 The Tribunal rejected the application for condonation of delay in filing appeals after a nine-year delay, citing the appellant's failure to inform the department about a change of address and lack of seriousness towards the notice. Relying on legal principles and precedents, including the maxim COMMODUM EX INJURIA SUA MEMO HABERE DEBET, the Tribunal held that the delay could not be condoned under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963. Consequently, the appeals were deemed not maintainable, and both the application and appeals were dismissed. en-us Mon, 23 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 13 Dec 2017 08:26:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352332 The Tribunal rejected the application for condonation of delay in filing appeals after a nine-year delay, citing the appellant's failure to inform the department about a change of address and lack of seriousness towards the notice. Relying on legal principles and precedents, including the maxim COMMODUM EX INJURIA SUA MEMO HABERE DEBET, the Tribunal held that the delay could not be condoned under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963. Consequently, the appeals were deemed not maintainable, and both the application and appeals were dismissed. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 23 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352332