<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 596 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352327</link>
    <description>The appellant filed refund applications seeking interest under Section 11BB of the Central Excise Act, 1944, relying on relevant court judgments. The dispute centered on the interpretation of Section 11BB, clarifying that interest is payable only after a refund order under Section 11B. The Tribunal directed the adjudicating authority to assess compliance with refund application filing and granted entitlement to interest if refunds were delayed. However, retrospective interest was denied as the lis concluded with the Tribunal&#039;s order. All appeals were remanded for further examination based on legal principles, emphasizing the need for a valid refund order for interest entitlement.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 08:25:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=499509" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 596 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352327</link>
      <description>The appellant filed refund applications seeking interest under Section 11BB of the Central Excise Act, 1944, relying on relevant court judgments. The dispute centered on the interpretation of Section 11BB, clarifying that interest is payable only after a refund order under Section 11B. The Tribunal directed the adjudicating authority to assess compliance with refund application filing and granted entitlement to interest if refunds were delayed. However, retrospective interest was denied as the lis concluded with the Tribunal&#039;s order. All appeals were remanded for further examination based on legal principles, emphasizing the need for a valid refund order for interest entitlement.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352327</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>