<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 593 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352324</link>
    <description>The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to re-examine the nature of forward contracts to determine if they qualify as hedging transactions and to reconsider the disallowance of exchange fluctuation loss accordingly. The disallowances under Section 14A and Section 36(1)(iii) were upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2017 12:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=499506" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 593 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352324</link>
      <description>The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to re-examine the nature of forward contracts to determine if they qualify as hedging transactions and to reconsider the disallowance of exchange fluctuation loss accordingly. The disallowances under Section 14A and Section 36(1)(iii) were upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352324</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>