https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196714 Ex parte trademark injunction was vacated because the plaintiff had not made full and fair disclosure of the defendant's existing registration in class 4 and had arrayed the parties in a manner viewed as suppressive. The court held that concealment of a material trademark registration disentitled the plaintiff to equitable relief. It further found no prima facie passing off, as the plaintiff produced no material showing misrepresentation, consumer deception, or likely injury to goodwill from the defendant's use of the mark for lubricants. The defendant's prior and extensive use, together with the absence of confusion evidence, meant the interim restraint could not be sustained. en-us Thu, 07 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 12 Dec 2017 18:47:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196714 Ex parte trademark injunction was vacated because the plaintiff had not made full and fair disclosure of the defendant's existing registration in class 4 and had arrayed the parties in a manner viewed as suppressive. The court held that concealment of a material trademark registration disentitled the plaintiff to equitable relief. It further found no prima facie passing off, as the plaintiff produced no material showing misrepresentation, consumer deception, or likely injury to goodwill from the defendant's use of the mark for lubricants. The defendant's prior and extensive use, together with the absence of confusion evidence, meant the interim restraint could not be sustained. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 07 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196714