<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (12) TMI 1279 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196710</link>
    <description>Interlocutory trademark injunctions require full and frank disclosure; suppression of material facts, a false date of knowledge, and prolonged inaction can amount to laches and acquiescence, defeating equitable relief. Prior registration and prima facie user of EVEREADY for hand tools, together with different goods, trade channels, and consumer classes, reduced any likelihood of confusion and did not justify restraining use of the mark for screwdrivers and pliers. An assignment deed may still be relied on for the limited purpose of resisting interim relief even if recording of title is pending, because non-registration of the assignment does not by itself negate the transferee&#039;s rights.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2017 18:13:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=499487" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (12) TMI 1279 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196710</link>
      <description>Interlocutory trademark injunctions require full and frank disclosure; suppression of material facts, a false date of knowledge, and prolonged inaction can amount to laches and acquiescence, defeating equitable relief. Prior registration and prima facie user of EVEREADY for hand tools, together with different goods, trade channels, and consumer classes, reduced any likelihood of confusion and did not justify restraining use of the mark for screwdrivers and pliers. An assignment deed may still be relied on for the limited purpose of resisting interim relief even if recording of title is pending, because non-registration of the assignment does not by itself negate the transferee&#039;s rights.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196710</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>