<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (8) TMI 1124 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196704</link>
    <description>Section 112 of the Code of Civil Procedure does not wholly exclude the Code from admiralty proceedings, because admiralty rules and related provisions continue to apply to institute, enforcement and incidental procedure. Section 44A operates as an independent statutory mechanism for execution of a foreign money decree in India: once a certified decree of a reciprocating superior court is filed, the Indian court acts as the executing court, subject to the defences in Section 13. The distinction between decrees in rem and in personam did not prevent enforcement here, and arrest of the vessel was maintainable as security and in execution, if otherwise permissible under the statute.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2017 17:10:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=499476" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (8) TMI 1124 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196704</link>
      <description>Section 112 of the Code of Civil Procedure does not wholly exclude the Code from admiralty proceedings, because admiralty rules and related provisions continue to apply to institute, enforcement and incidental procedure. Section 44A operates as an independent statutory mechanism for execution of a foreign money decree in India: once a certified decree of a reciprocating superior court is filed, the Indian court acts as the executing court, subject to the defences in Section 13. The distinction between decrees in rem and in personam did not prevent enforcement here, and arrest of the vessel was maintainable as security and in execution, if otherwise permissible under the statute.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196704</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>