https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196701 A pre-Constitution decree passed by the Gwalior court was treated as a foreign judgment because, at the date of decree, that court was in an Indian State and the defendants had not submitted to its jurisdiction. Later accession and constitutional changes did not retrospectively validate the decree outside Madhya Bharat. The purported transfer for execution to Allahabad also failed because the transfer powers under the Code applied only to a decree of a court then governed by the Code, which this court was not. Sections 43 and 44 of the Code, and Article 261 of the Constitution, did not retrospectively make the decree executable in Uttar Pradesh. en-us Mon, 30 Apr 1962 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 12 Dec 2017 16:10:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196701 A pre-Constitution decree passed by the Gwalior court was treated as a foreign judgment because, at the date of decree, that court was in an Indian State and the defendants had not submitted to its jurisdiction. Later accession and constitutional changes did not retrospectively validate the decree outside Madhya Bharat. The purported transfer for execution to Allahabad also failed because the transfer powers under the Code applied only to a decree of a court then governed by the Code, which this court was not. Sections 43 and 44 of the Code, and Article 261 of the Constitution, did not retrospectively make the decree executable in Uttar Pradesh. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 30 Apr 1962 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196701