<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (1) TMI 912 - SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196696</link>
    <description>The tribunal concluded that none of the charges against NSDL and CDSL were established. It emphasized the need for SEBI and the depositories to work together to secure investor interests and the integrity of the securities market. The tribunal set aside the impugned orders and allowed the appeals, leaving the parties to bear their own costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2017 15:07:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=499461" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (1) TMI 912 - SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196696</link>
      <description>The tribunal concluded that none of the charges against NSDL and CDSL were established. It emphasized the need for SEBI and the depositories to work together to secure investor interests and the integrity of the securities market. The tribunal set aside the impugned orders and allowed the appeals, leaving the parties to bear their own costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196696</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>