<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 590 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352321</link>
    <description>Section 43B allows deduction only where the assessee has actually paid its own tax, duty, cess or fee liability. Excise duty deposited in a personal ledger account against an incurred liability on manufactured stock is treated as deductible. Unutilised MODVAT credit and sales-tax recoverable balances, recorded as current assets or contractual payments, are not deductible; earlier-year credit adjusted during the relevant year may qualify subject to verification. Raw-material consumption need not be remanded where technical workings and excise-settlement material already establish the methodology, and absence of a separate stock register alone does not justify rejecting books where other records and physical verification exist. Abandoned application-software expenditure may be revenue outlay where it creates no enduring capital asset.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2018 12:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=499450" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 590 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352321</link>
      <description>Section 43B allows deduction only where the assessee has actually paid its own tax, duty, cess or fee liability. Excise duty deposited in a personal ledger account against an incurred liability on manufactured stock is treated as deductible. Unutilised MODVAT credit and sales-tax recoverable balances, recorded as current assets or contractual payments, are not deductible; earlier-year credit adjusted during the relevant year may qualify subject to verification. Raw-material consumption need not be remanded where technical workings and excise-settlement material already establish the methodology, and absence of a separate stock register alone does not justify rejecting books where other records and physical verification exist. Abandoned application-software expenditure may be revenue outlay where it creates no enduring capital asset.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352321</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>