<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (3) TMI 936 - SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196690</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the direction debarring the appellant from accessing the capital market and dealing in securities, finding it beyond SEBI&#039;s powers and not in the interest of the securities market. The Tribunal upheld the finding of non-compliance with regulation 7(1) and SEBI&#039;s decision to appoint an Adjudicating Officer for further inquiry and penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2017 12:46:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=499448" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (3) TMI 936 - SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196690</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the direction debarring the appellant from accessing the capital market and dealing in securities, finding it beyond SEBI&#039;s powers and not in the interest of the securities market. The Tribunal upheld the finding of non-compliance with regulation 7(1) and SEBI&#039;s decision to appoint an Adjudicating Officer for further inquiry and penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196690</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>