<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 589 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352320</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal by modifying the profit estimation in the IMFL business to 5% of purchases, considering factors like license fees and selling limitations. Additionally, the Tribunal approved the addition towards unexplained expenditure as the assessee failed to explain the source of funds. The delay in filing the appeal was condoned, and the case was admitted for disposal on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2017 12:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=499444" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 589 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352320</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal by modifying the profit estimation in the IMFL business to 5% of purchases, considering factors like license fees and selling limitations. Additionally, the Tribunal approved the addition towards unexplained expenditure as the assessee failed to explain the source of funds. The delay in filing the appeal was condoned, and the case was admitted for disposal on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352320</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>