https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196687 Section 64A of the Sale of Goods Act, 1930 does not override a contract that shows a different intention on duty allocation; where the agreement fixed inclusive rates and covered levies except a specified duty, later enhancement of export duty could not be recovered separately. The Court also reiterated that an arbitral award cannot be disturbed merely because another interpretation of the material is possible, since judicial interference cannot substitute the Court's view for the arbitrator's where two views are reasonably open. On that reasoning, the objections to the award were rejected and the award was made the rule of the Court. en-us Thu, 01 Jan 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 12 Dec 2017 12:08:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196687 Section 64A of the Sale of Goods Act, 1930 does not override a contract that shows a different intention on duty allocation; where the agreement fixed inclusive rates and covered levies except a specified duty, later enhancement of export duty could not be recovered separately. The Court also reiterated that an arbitral award cannot be disturbed merely because another interpretation of the material is possible, since judicial interference cannot substitute the Court's view for the arbitrator's where two views are reasonably open. On that reasoning, the objections to the award were rejected and the award was made the rule of the Court. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 01 Jan 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196687