<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (4) TMI 880 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196685</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the High Court&#039;s order and restoring the trial court&#039;s decision in a property dispute. The plaintiffs sought to amend the plaint, claiming lack of awareness of a conveyance deed dated 08.02.1989 until 2009, alleging forgery. However, it was established that the plaintiff was aware of and authorized to complete the transaction. The Supreme Court found the proposed amendments belated and dismissed the Chamber Summons seeking amendment, as the plaintiffs were aware of the relevant facts before filing the suit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2017 11:29:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=499436" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (4) TMI 880 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196685</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the High Court&#039;s order and restoring the trial court&#039;s decision in a property dispute. The plaintiffs sought to amend the plaint, claiming lack of awareness of a conveyance deed dated 08.02.1989 until 2009, alleging forgery. However, it was established that the plaintiff was aware of and authorized to complete the transaction. The Supreme Court found the proposed amendments belated and dismissed the Chamber Summons seeking amendment, as the plaintiffs were aware of the relevant facts before filing the suit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196685</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>