<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 1479 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT (NAGPUR BENCH)</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196684</link>
    <description>After commencement of trial, an amendment of pleadings under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC can be permitted only if the applicant pleads and proves due diligence, showing that the matter could not have been raised earlier despite reasonable effort or that it arises from subsequent events. The proposed amendment was rejected because the application disclosed no such facts and the new plea was already within the defendants&#039; knowledge when the written statement was filed. The refusal to permit amendment was sustained and the writ petition failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2017 11:20:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=499435" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 1479 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT (NAGPUR BENCH)</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196684</link>
      <description>After commencement of trial, an amendment of pleadings under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC can be permitted only if the applicant pleads and proves due diligence, showing that the matter could not have been raised earlier despite reasonable effort or that it arises from subsequent events. The proposed amendment was rejected because the application disclosed no such facts and the new plea was already within the defendants&#039; knowledge when the written statement was filed. The refusal to permit amendment was sustained and the writ petition failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196684</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>