<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 585 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352316</link>
    <description>The court held that the reassessment proceedings initiated against the petitioner for the Assessment Year 2009-10 were barred under the proviso to Section 147 of the Income Tax Act. The petitioner had fully and truly disclosed all material facts during the original assessment, and there was no new tangible material to justify the reassessment. As a result, the court quashed the reassessment proceedings and allowed the writ petition with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2018 14:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=499421" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 585 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352316</link>
      <description>The court held that the reassessment proceedings initiated against the petitioner for the Assessment Year 2009-10 were barred under the proviso to Section 147 of the Income Tax Act. The petitioner had fully and truly disclosed all material facts during the original assessment, and there was no new tangible material to justify the reassessment. As a result, the court quashed the reassessment proceedings and allowed the writ petition with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352316</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>