<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 575 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352306</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee in appeals against penalties under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for assessment years 2007-08, 2008-09, and 2009-10. The Tribunal found the penalty proceedings flawed due to an ambiguous notice issued by the Assessing Officer, leading to the deletion of penalties for all three assessment years. The appeals were allowed, and penalties for all three years were deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2017 09:35:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=499411" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 575 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352306</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee in appeals against penalties under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for assessment years 2007-08, 2008-09, and 2009-10. The Tribunal found the penalty proceedings flawed due to an ambiguous notice issued by the Assessing Officer, leading to the deletion of penalties for all three assessment years. The appeals were allowed, and penalties for all three years were deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352306</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>