https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352303 A two-day delay in filing objections before the Dispute Resolution Panel under section 144C(2) was treated as condonable because the dispute depended on the date of receipt of the draft assessment order and the resulting thirty-day filing period. The objections were therefore directed to be entertained, and the matter was sent back to the DRP for decision on those objections. The separate contention on limitation in passing the final assessment order was not pressed. en-us Mon, 04 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 12 Dec 2017 09:35:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352303 A two-day delay in filing objections before the Dispute Resolution Panel under section 144C(2) was treated as condonable because the dispute depended on the date of receipt of the draft assessment order and the resulting thirty-day filing period. The objections were therefore directed to be entertained, and the matter was sent back to the DRP for decision on those objections. The separate contention on limitation in passing the final assessment order was not pressed. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 04 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352303