https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352294 Imported goods obtained under the DEEC scheme were diverted to the domestic market rather than used in manufacture, and the alleged supporting manufacturer was found to be non-existent. On these facts, the scheme benefit was denied and the confiscation, duty demand, redemption fine, and penalties were upheld because there was no proof of bona fide use of the imports in the stated manufacturing activity. The appeals were dismissed and the adjudication order was affirmed in full. en-us Thu, 14 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 28 Feb 2019 12:49:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352294 Imported goods obtained under the DEEC scheme were diverted to the domestic market rather than used in manufacture, and the alleged supporting manufacturer was found to be non-existent. On these facts, the scheme benefit was denied and the confiscation, duty demand, redemption fine, and penalties were upheld because there was no proof of bona fide use of the imports in the stated manufacturing activity. The appeals were dismissed and the adjudication order was affirmed in full. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 14 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352294