https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352289 Admitted signatures on the cheque, coupled with an unrebutted presumption of service of the statutory demand notice, sustained liability under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The defence of theft was rejected because no prompt or credible complaint was made, and the explanation for possession of blank signed cheques was found unconvincing. On the evidence, the concurrent findings of the trial and appellate courts disclosed no perversity or illegality, so revisional interference was declined and the conviction with sentence was upheld. en-us Mon, 04 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 12 Dec 2017 09:31:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352289 Admitted signatures on the cheque, coupled with an unrebutted presumption of service of the statutory demand notice, sustained liability under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The defence of theft was rejected because no prompt or credible complaint was made, and the explanation for possession of blank signed cheques was found unconvincing. On the evidence, the concurrent findings of the trial and appellate courts disclosed no perversity or illegality, so revisional interference was declined and the conviction with sentence was upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 04 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352289