<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (1) TMI 24 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10920</link>
    <description>The court quashed the Commissioner&#039;s decision to decline waiver of penalties and interest under section 273A of the Income-tax Act, remanding the matter for reconsideration based on the fulfilled conditions for reduction or waiver. The court emphasized the voluntary nature of disclosure as a crucial factor, noting that despite investigations being initiated, the disclosure was voluntary as no incriminating material was in possession of the Assessing Officer before the disclosure. The court highlighted that the husband&#039;s visit and disclosure were voluntary, supporting the petitioner&#039;s argument. The petition was allowed with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 18:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=49939" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (1) TMI 24 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10920</link>
      <description>The court quashed the Commissioner&#039;s decision to decline waiver of penalties and interest under section 273A of the Income-tax Act, remanding the matter for reconsideration based on the fulfilled conditions for reduction or waiver. The court emphasized the voluntary nature of disclosure as a crucial factor, noting that despite investigations being initiated, the disclosure was voluntary as no incriminating material was in possession of the Assessing Officer before the disclosure. The court highlighted that the husband&#039;s visit and disclosure were voluntary, supporting the petitioner&#039;s argument. The petition was allowed with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10920</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>