<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 551 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352282</link>
    <description>Duty under the packing-machine based levy must be computed pro rata when a machine is installed and used only for part of a month, because Rule 9 requires assessment from the date of commencement of production for the remaining days of that month. On the facts, the machine operated only for two days in February 2012, so demand for duty for the full month was not sustainable. The governing rules also did not authorise confiscation of raw material, packing material, or the undeclared pouch packing machine; confiscation was confined to finished goods. The matter was therefore limited to fresh quantification of redemption fine on the finished goods alone.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2017 16:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=499383" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 551 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352282</link>
      <description>Duty under the packing-machine based levy must be computed pro rata when a machine is installed and used only for part of a month, because Rule 9 requires assessment from the date of commencement of production for the remaining days of that month. On the facts, the machine operated only for two days in February 2012, so demand for duty for the full month was not sustainable. The governing rules also did not authorise confiscation of raw material, packing material, or the undeclared pouch packing machine; confiscation was confined to finished goods. The matter was therefore limited to fresh quantification of redemption fine on the finished goods alone.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352282</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>