<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 549 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352280</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed in favor of M/s. Laxmi Pipes, with the judge finding that penalties should be dropped due to similar cases where penalties were revoked. The penalty imposed on Shri Mukesh Sangla was set aside based on lack of new evidence and a previous decision in his favor. Similarly, the penalty on Shri Sunil Kotari was also revoked as previous tribunal decisions rejected similar statements, leading to the judge finding no merit in maintaining the penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2017 09:07:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=499381" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 549 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352280</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed in favor of M/s. Laxmi Pipes, with the judge finding that penalties should be dropped due to similar cases where penalties were revoked. The penalty imposed on Shri Mukesh Sangla was set aside based on lack of new evidence and a previous decision in his favor. Similarly, the penalty on Shri Sunil Kotari was also revoked as previous tribunal decisions rejected similar statements, leading to the judge finding no merit in maintaining the penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352280</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>