<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (8) TMI 1132 - COMPANY LAW BOARD, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196670</link>
    <description>The applications for amendments (CA Nos. 173 and 174 of 2014) were dismissed by the Board, finding them complex, irrelevant, and a result of afterthought. The VPM group was granted liberty to file newly discovered documents with an affidavit. The application for an independent valuer (CA No. 172 of 2014) will be considered after final arguments in CP No. 35 of 2013.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2017 08:42:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=499367" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (8) TMI 1132 - COMPANY LAW BOARD, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196670</link>
      <description>The applications for amendments (CA Nos. 173 and 174 of 2014) were dismissed by the Board, finding them complex, irrelevant, and a result of afterthought. The VPM group was granted liberty to file newly discovered documents with an affidavit. The application for an independent valuer (CA No. 172 of 2014) will be considered after final arguments in CP No. 35 of 2013.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196670</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>