<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (7) TMI 1258 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196672</link>
    <description>The article explains that, in alleged breaches of the Transplantation of Human Organs and Tissues Act, prior approval from the relevant State Authorisation Committee is required before removal and transplantation when the donor and recipient belong to that State. It also states that breach of the transplantation statute is to be dealt with through the Appropriate Authority and a complaint-based prosecution route, rather than a police FIR and investigation, though connected IPC offences may still be investigated separately. For arrest on the IPC side, the document stresses the need for recorded reasons under the Code of Criminal Procedure and proper communication of grounds of arrest, while noting that delay in production before a Magistrate was justified on the facts discussed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2017 08:42:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=499365" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (7) TMI 1258 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196672</link>
      <description>The article explains that, in alleged breaches of the Transplantation of Human Organs and Tissues Act, prior approval from the relevant State Authorisation Committee is required before removal and transplantation when the donor and recipient belong to that State. It also states that breach of the transplantation statute is to be dealt with through the Appropriate Authority and a complaint-based prosecution route, rather than a police FIR and investigation, though connected IPC offences may still be investigated separately. For arrest on the IPC side, the document stresses the need for recorded reasons under the Code of Criminal Procedure and proper communication of grounds of arrest, while noting that delay in production before a Magistrate was justified on the facts discussed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196672</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>