https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196675 Cancellation of medical entrance results and admissions was discussed in the context of alleged large-scale examination malpractice, with the opinions noting that reliable circumstantial and expert material may justify cancellation without individual notice to every candidate if the process is broadly vitiated. One opinion relied on public policy and declined equitable relief despite delay, while the other also refused extraordinary relief under Article 142. Both opinions treated the alleged defect in the Board's constitution as insufficient to warrant interference. The matter was not finally concluded by a majority determination and was placed before the Chief Justice for further orders. en-us Thu, 12 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 12 Dec 2017 08:42:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196675 Cancellation of medical entrance results and admissions was discussed in the context of alleged large-scale examination malpractice, with the opinions noting that reliable circumstantial and expert material may justify cancellation without individual notice to every candidate if the process is broadly vitiated. One opinion relied on public policy and declined equitable relief despite delay, while the other also refused extraordinary relief under Article 142. Both opinions treated the alleged defect in the Board's constitution as insufficient to warrant interference. The matter was not finally concluded by a majority determination and was placed before the Chief Justice for further orders. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 12 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196675