<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>S.43B -Un-necessary litigation by revenue an appeal before the Supreme Court on an issue which was well settled. S.43B must be omitted from the Income-tax Act</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=7765</link>
    <description>Section 43B requires specified deductions to be claimed only in the year of actual payment irrespective of accounting method. The article explains adjustments: disallow unpaid amounts charged to profit and loss, and allow payments actually made in the previous year (including advances, payments under protest, and payments against past liabilities not debited to profit and loss). It argues that the provision causes timing disputes and administrative burdens, often without material revenue benefit, and recommends deletion so recovery is handled by other enforcement mechanisms.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2017 08:35:52 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2017 08:35:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=499352" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>S.43B -Un-necessary litigation by revenue an appeal before the Supreme Court on an issue which was well settled. S.43B must be omitted from the Income-tax Act</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=7765</link>
      <description>Section 43B requires specified deductions to be claimed only in the year of actual payment irrespective of accounting method. The article explains adjustments: disallow unpaid amounts charged to profit and loss, and allow payments actually made in the previous year (including advances, payments under protest, and payments against past liabilities not debited to profit and loss). It argues that the provision causes timing disputes and administrative burdens, often without material revenue benefit, and recommends deletion so recovery is handled by other enforcement mechanisms.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2017 08:35:52 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=7765</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>