https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196667 The court held that Nanak Chand did not qualify as a displaced person or refugee under statutory definitions due to his death before civil disturbances, thus denying land allotment in his name post-partition. Emphasizing statutory provisions over administrative instructions, the court affirmed the cancellation of the land allotted to his sons. The decision was based on upholding the rule of law and ensuring executive actions comply with legality. The appeal was dismissed, setting a precedent for similar cases with identical legal issues. en-us Fri, 05 Apr 1968 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 11 Dec 2017 18:04:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196667 The court held that Nanak Chand did not qualify as a displaced person or refugee under statutory definitions due to his death before civil disturbances, thus denying land allotment in his name post-partition. Emphasizing statutory provisions over administrative instructions, the court affirmed the cancellation of the land allotted to his sons. The decision was based on upholding the rule of law and ensuring executive actions comply with legality. The appeal was dismissed, setting a precedent for similar cases with identical legal issues. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 05 Apr 1968 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196667