https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196664 The court held that the presence of armed police guards outside the jail and the live-wire electrical mechanism atop the jail walls did not violate the petitioners' fundamental rights. It was determined that these measures were necessary for security and did not unduly infringe on the prisoners' liberties. Therefore, the petitioners' requests for removal of the guards and dismantling of the live-wire mechanism were denied, as the court found no interference with their fundamental rights. The rule was discharged, affirming the legality of the security measures taken by the jail authorities. en-us Mon, 09 Sep 1974 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 11 Dec 2017 17:46:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196664 The court held that the presence of armed police guards outside the jail and the live-wire electrical mechanism atop the jail walls did not violate the petitioners' fundamental rights. It was determined that these measures were necessary for security and did not unduly infringe on the prisoners' liberties. Therefore, the petitioners' requests for removal of the guards and dismantling of the live-wire mechanism were denied, as the court found no interference with their fundamental rights. The rule was discharged, affirming the legality of the security measures taken by the jail authorities. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 09 Sep 1974 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196664