https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10915 The court dismissed the appeal by the State Bank of Bikaner and Jaipur challenging an order under article 226(3) of the Constitution of India, emphasizing the need to exhaust statutory remedies before seeking discretionary remedies. The court criticized the bypassing of statutory remedies in income-tax matters, directing timely resolution of pending appeals by the Income-tax Department. Costs of Rs. 2,000 were imposed on the bank for unnecessary litigation, highlighting the importance of following prescribed procedures and avoiding wastage of public money. en-us Mon, 28 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 27 Jul 2009 17:49:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10915 The court dismissed the appeal by the State Bank of Bikaner and Jaipur challenging an order under article 226(3) of the Constitution of India, emphasizing the need to exhaust statutory remedies before seeking discretionary remedies. The court criticized the bypassing of statutory remedies in income-tax matters, directing timely resolution of pending appeals by the Income-tax Department. Costs of Rs. 2,000 were imposed on the bank for unnecessary litigation, highlighting the importance of following prescribed procedures and avoiding wastage of public money. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 28 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10915